101 . Newhagen , John E. , “Past mind-report: Playing with latency to answer design practical Dominikanci Еѕene za brak question responding procedure towards the web-centered public-opinion surveys,” regarding the Sourcebook to have Political Communication Research , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you will Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( Ny : Routledge , 2011 ).Bing Pupil
102 . Oxley , Douglas R. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John R. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you will Hibbing , John Roentgen. , “Political thinking are different which have emotional qualities,” Technology , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Are women likely to vote getting women’s circumstances debts than simply the men associates?” Legislative Education Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle College student
104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Feminine Make: The insurance policy Perception of females inside Congress ( il : University off il Force , 2002 ).Bing Pupil
105 . Slope , Kim Quaile and you may Hurley , Patricia A great. , “Emblematic speeches throughout the U.S. Senate in addition to their representational effects,” Diary of Government 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle College student
108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Will be blacks depict blacks and you may feminine portray feminine? A beneficial contingent ‘yes’,” Diary regarding Government 1999 , 61 ( step 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner
109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-associated governmental training together with descriptive logo of women,” Governmental Conclusion 2003 , 25 : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner
110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Is there good ‘gender attraction effect’ inside American politics? S. Family elections,” Political Search Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil
This informative article might have been quoted because of the following books. So it list is done centered on analysis provided with Crossref.
Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney A beneficial. and you can Lust, Ellen 2015. Would it be Gender, Religiosity otherwise One another? A role Congruity Idea out of Applicant Electability into the Transformation Tunisia. Point of views into the Politics, Vol. 13, Matter. step one, p. 74.
Bauer, Nichole Yards. 2015. Who stereotypes female applicants? Distinguishing private variations in women stereotype dependence. Politics, Teams, and Identities, Vol. step 3, Question. step 1, p. 94.
Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “New role of gender in detailed icon,” Governmental Browse Every quarter 1995 , forty eight : 599 – 611
McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, More youthful Mie Knisely, Sandra and McLeod, Douglas 2015. When female attack. Politics together with Life Sciences, Vol. 34, Matter. step one, p. 49.
Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you may Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Giving blended indicators: new character out of gender and partisanship for the ratings off politicians. Log off Elections, Public opinion and you may Events, Vol. twenty-six, Topic. cuatro, p. 423.
Koch, Thomas and you can Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. Having Heart and (No) Brain? Just how Recipients Negatively Infer Destroyed Factual statements about People in politics and how That it Influences the new Research of your Speakermunication Research, Vol. 43, Procedure. seven, p. 972.
Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you may Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Deciding Thinking out-of Female People in politics: The scenario of Poland. Government into the Central Europe, Vol. fourteen, Matter. step 3, p. eight.
Schneider, Monica C. and Bos, Angela L. 2019. The effective use of Societal Role Theory on Examination of Gender when you look at the Politics. Governmental Therapy, Vol. forty, Question. S1, p. 173.
Park, Sunshine More youthful and Baek, More youthful Minute 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence towards the Female Politicians: As to the reasons Ambivalence Things having Gender Equivalence for the a good Democracy. Journal of women, Politics & Policy, Vol. forty, Thing. dos, p. 309.
Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Character Assassination and you may Feamales in Government. Corvinus Journal regarding Globally Products, Vol. 4, Matter. 1, p. fifteen.
Aaldering, Loes and you can Van Der Jamais, Daphne Joanna 2020. Governmental Frontrunners regarding the Media: Gender Bias into the Frontrunner Stereotypes through the Promotion and you will Regime Moments. British Journal of Governmental Research, Vol. fifty, Material. step 3, p. 911.
Boer, Noortje 2020. How can Residents Assess Roadway?Level Bureaucrats’ Love and you may Proficiency? A beneficial Typology and you may Decide to try. Personal Government Opinion, Vol. 80, Material. cuatro, p. 532.