- PLoS One to. 2021; 16(2): e0246350. »
- Publisher response to Decision Page 0
Firstly, we would like to give thanks to the fresh new editor therefore the reviewers having the effort committed to reviewing this manuscript. Their comments was basically quite beneficial to improve our work.
From our point of view, we are not assuming Paulista in Brazil wives that matchmaking application use make a difference mating orientation
Having fun with a large sample regarding unmarried Language students (n = 902) which papers talks about just how personal differences in mating positioning changes ranging from people using matchmaking applications and you may non-users. My learning of inclusion is because they must glance at the connection ranging from mating short-name and a lot of time-label orientations and also the usage of relationship applications. In place of looking at facts that affect the entry to relationship software as the learned in the early in the day literary works, it expect needs for very long-label and you will brief-identity mating positioning throughout the usage of relationship apps. Especially, it regress age gender, sexual direction, therefore the usage of relationships software on SOI-R, SOI-Decisions, SOI-Attitudes, and you can SOI-Desire, and you may A lot of time-identity Mating Orientation (LTMO). E.g., on the abstract it is said that there was in fact zero variations in the long-title positioning because the a function of use/non-explore. I have found this difficult out of a theoretic section, as they appear to believe that relationships app fool around with can impact mating positioning as opposed to the most other ways up to. Mating orientation while the mentioned which have SOI-Roentgen and you may MSOI was procedures regarding choices and you can identification features.
Response: We wish to thank Customer step 1 on time and effort committed to reviewing our manuscript as well as their/their own comments. Your recommendations was indeed very helpful to evolve the really works.
In the analysis almost step 1/step 3 of your students was classified as actually sexual minority
Thank you for the ability to clarify this time. All of our research purpose would be to make certain if discover differences between profiles and non-profiles out-of relationships software during the mating orientations (short-term and you can much time-term). We have attempted to get this clearer by changing the new name of our manuscript, that is now “Perform more youthful dating software profiles and you will low-pages differ inside the mating orientations?”. Within our analysis, no specific causality (personality apps have fun with otherwise applications play with character) is intended. With a combination-sectional build, we simply cannot establish one. You will find made use of the studies we envision which is ideal suited to a reaction to our lookup concern. Regarding Conceptual (p. dos, contours 29-33), for-instance, we typed:
It was found that, while relationship programs profiles had a high short-label mating positioning than low-pages (more regular choices, higher focus, and great attitude), there are no differences in the brand new enough time-title direction since the a purpose of use/non-have fun with.
Right here, as well as all through the brand new manuscript, you will find demonstrated the outcomes while the detailed, not with any particular assumption off grounds and outcomes.
The method area brings a great perception of one’s take to properties. New take to regarding people seem to diverge somewhat from a general student inhabitants with regard to the latest proportion regarding non-heterosexual college students. This isn’t discussed on the study constraints (decreased representativeness).
Response: Thank you so much greatly to suit your statements and you can suggestion. The shot is really distinctive from that of education carried out in other geographic and cultural contexts, which have a higher ratio out of users of sexual minorities. Although not, we are not knowing from the why this needs to be an indication out of use up all your from representativeness, in the event, without a doubt, we and additionally you should never verify representativeness of your decide to try. The fresh new testing because of it study are equivalent otherwise nearly the same as the newest sampling off earlier training throughout the exact same research class (come across Table lower than).